Reciprocal alturism is very rare in animals, but has been proposed for birds that fly in formation. Now direct study of how the turn-taking occurs adds credence to the hypothesis. (via NewScientist)
The paper is outside the PNAS paywall
Matching times of leading and following suggest cooperation through direct reciprocity during V-formation flight in ibis
Bernhard Voelkla,b,c,1, Steven J. Portugald,2, Markus Unsölde,f, James R. Usherwoodd, Alan M. Wilsond, and Johannes Fritzc,e
Author Affiliations
aEdward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom;
bInstitute for Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, 3032 Hinkterkappelen, Switzerland;
cInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt University at Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany;
dStructure & Motion Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Herts AL9 7TA, United Kingdom;
eWaldrappteam, 6162 Mutters, Austria; and
fOrnithology Section, Bavarian Zoological State Collection, 81247 Munich, Germany
Significance
Cooperation in animals is an enigma because it contravenes the basic notion that evolution favors selfish genes that promote only their own well-being. Bird migration in organized V-shaped or echelon formations constitutes such a cooperation dilemma. We show that juvenile Northern bald ibis (Geronticus eremita) cooperate by taking turns and precisely matching times they spend in the advantageous trailing position and in the disadvantageous front position. This time matching is done on a pairwise level. Furthermore, we found evidence that the animals' propensity to reciprocate in leading has a substantial influence on the size and cohesion of the flight formations. This study shows that direct reciprocation can enable cooperation between animals in a natural context.
One conspicuous feature of several larger bird species is their annual migration in V-shaped or echelon formation. When birds are flying in these formations, energy savings can be achieved by using the aerodynamic up-wash produced by the preceding bird. As the leading bird in a formation cannot profit from this up-wash, a social dilemma arises around the question of who is going to fly in front? To investigate how this dilemma is solved, we studied the flight behavior of a flock of juvenile Northern bald ibis (Geronticus eremita) during a human-guided autumn migration. We could show that the amount of time a bird is leading a formation is strongly correlated with the time it can itself profit from flying in the wake of another bird. On the dyadic level, birds match the time they spend in the wake of each other by frequent pairwise switches of the leading position. Taken together, these results suggest that bald ibis cooperate by directly taking turns in leading a formation. On the proximate level, we propose that it is mainly the high number of iterations and the immediacy of reciprocation opportunities that favor direct reciprocation. Finally, we found evidence that the animals' propensity to reciprocate in leading has a substantial influence on the size and cohesion of the flight formations.
Comments