A few days ago Apple announced the AirPods Pro. It is largely being described as an AirPod with a noise cancelling feature and a higher price. It turns out to be much more than that and a couple of features give a few hints: transparency mode and how it does noise cancellation. I haven't played with them yet. My fun money budget is at zero dollars for the rest of the year.1 In the meantime there are trustworthy reviews from Om Malik and John Gruber.
Transparency mode is what it sounds like - ambient sounds around you are mixed in with those meant to go to the earbuds. You get a bad version with poorly sealed headphones/earbuds. Doing it propertly is tricky and initial reports indicate Apple has pulled it off. While most people will use the feature to be aware of their surroundings, it can easily become an augmented reality - specifically an acoustic augmented reality.
A variety of visual augmented reality devices and apps have appeared in the past decade. All have issued and none have cracked the mass market. iPhones and iPads happy to be visual AR ready. They mix a live image from the front pointing camera with a computed overlay. The result can be cute and even useful, but mostly it's cumbersome and something you try approximately once. Google, of course, has had a couple incarnations of their glasses. There are a number of issues and they appear to have found a few niches in business. At this point they're not exactly consumer clueful devices.
Augmented audio is less intrusive and a natural domain. Your AirPods Pro could be sending you turn by turn directions as you walk or bike through a city. Hey Siri is their ready to go interface. It would be a natural for reading recipes or a thousand other things. Anything where you want contextual information that is an augmentation of the acoustic soundscape around you. Then you don't have to switch modes completely and take out a device and/or give up the acoustic soundscape. It would be dandy for seniors - hey Siri, where did I leave my glasses?2
Speaking of senior citizens AirPod Pros have almost all the features needed to make a very high quality hearing aid. There is a test that uses feedback to find the best fitting silicone earpiece adapter. It woudn't be a big deal to do it over a range of frequencies for each ear and compute the corrections to sound in transparency mode. It would become an active computational hearing aid. They could probably even correct for tympanic movement (suggestion by Bryan William Jones). At the very least these could be the equivalent of non-prescription reading glasses and that could be free assuming you own these. Apple could work on what it would take to do proper testing and get them certified.
AirPods Pro augmented hearing could mean serious trouble for the conventional hearing aid industry. If you've ever had to deal with hearing aids - your own or for someone you help take care of - you find they cost two to five thousand dollars and they don't work very well. These hold the promise of being able to tune to new acoustic spaces in real time.. something regular hearing aids never have pulled off.
Everyone has been expecting Apple's AR glasses. They may well be coming, but in the meantime acoustic augmented reality can happen now and Apple could easily extend it into owning a new health market while they're doing it. There are some other computational tricks to enhance sound for folks with normal hearing, but for now I think these are the two big areas.
And finally - to answer some emails from frustrated hearing aid users - they did not announce a hearing aid. It's just the pieces are there for them. It wouldn't be much of a stretch and there is frustration over price and quality among hearing aid users.
___________
1 When we got married we decided to pool our income except for individual fun money accounts. They aren't big, but the agreement is the other spouse can't complain about what they're used for. One of the best things we've ever done. Most of my funds support time tithing activities.
2 Apple has the tech that allows good location (like 10 cm) using ultawide band beacons that could be very inexpensive and taped onto a pair of glasses for example. If you've ever had to help a friend or relative with dementia, this is a killer app.
imperfect storms
It's sad and frightening watching the fires in California. With the likelihood that some fires were triggered by power lines in high winds there are massive precautionary power blackouts. The result is an enormous amount of blame aimed at the already troubled power utility. That's only part of the problem.
Globally fire seasons have grown in length along with fire size and frequency. Australia, Siberia, Alaska, and the Western US and Canada have been hard hit in recent years. Much of this is from changing climate patterns driven by global warming, but some is the result of mismanagement and a failure to adapt.. Summaries found in the scientific literature are very clear: we need to recognize fire is natural - forests and grasslands need to burn periodically. We have to adapt to fire rather than completely subdue it. We need to reduce fuel near our infrastructure and homes in the wildlife-urban boundary regions. Easy to state, but very political and difficult in practice.
Better practices will probably emerge for property owners and hopefully new construction won't take place in the wildlife-urban boundary regions. Getting political acceptance for prescribed burns and letting nature shift the types of forest to what would naturally occur is going to be difficult. One worries the focus will be on bandages like shifting management and ownership of electric utilities, building microgrids, undergrounding transmission lines, and so on. Some of these might have merit on their own, but they divert attention and resources from real solutions. In the meantime blackouts are about the only short term lever to pull.
I suspect this is a good example of the need for a regional adaptation to deal with global warming fueled climate change. Most parts of the world have some local dangers that bring death and damage to some and inconvenience to many more. This will be a growing trend, but mitigation and adaptation can make a difference. Dealing with fire has known solutions. Too bad they’re not socially popular.
And a final comment.. why has this become bad so suddenly. It seems likely there's no single case, but some of the inputs have a good deal of natural variability and perhaps we're seeing just that - a resonance. That would suggest the likelihood of near term repeats is probably low. On the other hand maybe this is one of those sudden accelerations similar to what is occurring in the Arctic. Either way the long term prognosis is not great so it makes sense to become more clever and take clueful action.
__________
I first sent this as an email and received a few angry replies. Mostly along lines like: this isn't global warming, or it's an evil power company that needs to be taken over, or why do Easterners complain about little snowstorms when we have this... In fact local climates are changing and that we have to adapt. It will be messy, expensive and in some cases lives will be lost and there will be issues we haven't thought through. Mitigation efforts can reduce these adaptation expenses and are generally seen as cost effective although they're a bet on the future many aren't willing to take. Adaptation will be expensive, but if we're smart we can find clueful paths. We need to be planning and building now.
Posted at 03:12 PM in general comments, science | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Reblog (0)