« the social ipod | Main | 33.90 mpixel, 200 mbyte files »

October 09, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b54669e200e550274deb8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference efficiencies ...:

» tingilinde: efficiencies ... from Top Rung
Link: tingilinde: efficiencies .... Your calculations are impressive. [Read More]

Comments

These figures strike me as overoptimistic.

> an average adult (age 18 - 65) can produce 3 watts/kg for more than an hour
> amateur athletes produce 5 watts/kg for several hours

Not sure which of these I am. But in my 20s when I did a lot of rock climbing, some running and was fit, I could sustain 250 watts on a rowing ergometer for about 10 minutes. For "more than an hour" I could sustain about 150, or 2W/kg.

> elite athletes produce 6 and sometimes 7 watts/kg for several hours

For about half an hour. Somewhere in the low 200s total output is what the world's absolute top endurance athletes can keep up for several hours. Source: Tour de France 2005 diary by Floyd Landis' coach (Google "site:www.bicycling.com allen lim") Maybe marathon runners or ironman triathletes could do a bit more as a one-off with several weeks recovery, but not six days a week for three weeks like Tour riders

Both my figure and Lim's are power output at the crank/flywheel, not total energy output of the body incl. waste heat. Might that be the discrepancy?

> on a flat road a 70 kg adult requires 100 watts to walk 5 km/hr (about 3mph). a bicycle rider requires the same energy expenditure to travel 25 km/hr

Cycling at 25 kmh feels considerably harder than walking to me

> 80 kg man with 5 kg of groceries in a 2000 kg SUV makes little sense

I haven't owned a car for five years. The only time I routinely miss it is weekly family shopping, which is a great deal more than 5 kg and simply not feasible on a bike.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

friends